The Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act passed Congress on December 20, 2017 and was signed into law by the
President on December 22, 2017 (the enactment date). The legislation is massive, running 1,097
pages with committee reports. Congress
authorized the Treasury Department to write “legislative” regulations, so the
law won’t be settled for years to come.
Further, a technical corrections bill is expected. Every individual and business will be impacted
and whether you win or lose depends on your circumstances: where you live, how you earn income, and the
form of your business entity. The business
tax cuts are generally “permanent” but the individual tax cuts are temporary,
sunsetting after 2025. The massive
number of changes, the temporary nature of many of the significant changes, and
the risk of change in future political power bring a real sense of disruption
and uncertainty. Long-standing tax laws,
to which people have organized their businesses and personal lives, have
changed and will likely change again in the next eight years. Generalizations will be dangerous. Professional advisors will need to “unlearn”
the old ways of planning and embrace the challenge of learning how to plan in the
new landscape of “tax reform.”
Because so many
tax laws have changed, I will be posting a series of articles reviewing some of
the more important changes. This first
post deals with individual income tax rate cuts.
Married Filing Joint, Ordinary Income Tax Rates—2018
Prior Law
|
New Law
|
||
$19,050
|
10%
|
$19,050
|
10%
|
$77,400
|
15%
|
$77,400
|
12%
|
$156,150
|
25%
|
$165,000
|
22%
|
$237,950
|
28%
|
$315,000
|
24%
|
$424,950
|
33%
|
$400,000
|
32%
|
$480,050
|
35%
|
$600,000
|
35%
|
$480,051+
|
39.6%
|
$600,001+
|
37%
|
Single, Ordinary Income Tax Rates—2018
Prior Law
|
New Law
|
||
$9,525
|
10%
|
$9,525
|
10%
|
$38,700
|
15%
|
$38,700
|
12%
|
$93,700
|
25%
|
$82,500
|
22%
|
$195,450
|
28%
|
$157,500
|
24%
|
$424,950
|
33%
|
$200,000
|
32%
|
$426,700
|
35%
|
$500,000
|
35%
|
$426,701+
|
39.6%
|
$500,001+
|
37%
|
Trust/Estate, Ordinary Income Tax Rates—2018
Current Law
|
New Law
|
||
$2,600
|
15%
|
$2,550
|
10%
|
$6,100
|
25%
|
||
$9,300
|
28%
|
$9,150
|
24%
|
$12,700
|
33%
|
$12,500
|
35%
|
$12,701+
|
39.6%
|
$12,501+
|
37%
|
Long-Term Capital Gain and Qualified Dividend Tax
Rates—2018
Rate
|
MFJ
|
Single
|
Trust/Estate
|
0%
|
$77,200
|
$38,600
|
$2,600
|
15%
|
$479,000
|
$425,800
|
$12,700
|
20%
|
$479,001+
|
$425,801+
|
$12,701+
|
Observations Regarding the New Tax Rates
· The lowered tax rates are effective only for tax years
beginning in 2018 through 2025 after which the prior law rates return.
· The reduced top rate is still higher than the 2012 tax
rate of 35%.
· There is a sweet spot between $165,000 and $315,000 of
MFJ taxable income where the tax rate is significantly reduced.
· There is no “marriage penalty” for the first 5 rate
brackets. Previously this was true only
for the first 2 brackets.
· Although not shown, the head of household brackets vs.
single brackets are better only for the first three instead of all seven
brackets as was the case previously.
· The brackets are indexed by the slower link-chained
inflation method (C-CPI-U vs CPI-U) where the consumer is assumed to be able to
substitute cheaper products in response to increased prices. The new method does not sunset.
· With rates scheduled to increase after 2025, Roth
retirement account contributions should be considered before then.
· Tax savings should be invested for retirement as
increasing deficits will likely affect Social Security and Medicare benefits
for the upper middle class.
· Although estates and electing trusts can use a fiscal
year to defer income tax, most should think about a calendar year for the lower
tax rates.
· The preferential long-term capital gain and qualified
dividend tax rates are no longer linked to the ordinary tax rate brackets.
· The 3.8% net investment income tax under the
Affordable Care Act remains and applies when modified adjusted gross income
exceeds: $250,000 MFJ; $200,000 single;
and $12,500 trusts and estates
“Kiddie Tax” Simplified
The current
nightmare of preparing income tax returns of children under age 19 (24 if a full-time
student) is simplified. Instead of using
the parents’ tax rates, and lumping siblings together, a child’s unearned
income is taxed using the trust and estate tax rate brackets for both ordinary
and capital gain rates for unearned income.
The child’s earned income is taxed under the rates for single
individuals. However, simplification
comes at a cost for families not in the highest income tax bracket because the
top trust ordinary and capital gain tax rates are reached at only $12,500 of
taxable income.
Individual Alternative Minimum Tax Retained
Surprisingly,
the AMT was retained at the last minute as part of the horse trading to secure
votes from key senators. Repealing the
AMT would have been a great simplification to the law and it is disappointing
to see that it remains. The exemption
from AMT was increased slightly but the exemption phase-out threshold was
dramatically increased. For MFJ, the exemption
is increased from $86,200 to $109,400 with phaseout starting at $1,000,000 up
from $164,100. For a single, the
exemption is increased from $55,400 to $70,300 with phaseout starting at
$500,000 up from $123,100. The $24,600
exemption for an estate or trust is not changed and the phase-out continues to
start at $82,050.
Observations Regarding the AMT
Those paying
2017 AMT may find their marginal tax rates increasing in 2018 when AMT is less
likely to apply. For example, at
$500,000 of taxable income the rate would increase from the 28% AMT rate to the
35% regular tax rate. With the dramatic
changes to itemized deductions, AMT will be less likely to apply, although it
will continue to apply in a couple of circumstances. First, those exercising and holding incentive
stock option stock will continue to risk incurring the AMT. Second, because regular tax rates were cut
but AMT tax rates were not cut, it is possible upper middle-class taxpayers
will continue to be subject to the AMT, but at a higher income level. As generalizations are dangerous, it is
important to run tax projection calculations to determine how the AMT may apply
to taxpayers in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment