Several interesting developments regarding Obamacare
occurred during July 2014.
Premium Tax Credit
for Federal Exchanges
One of the primary features of the ACA is the
establishment of so-called health insurance exchanges, now termed
“marketplaces.” The law contemplated
that the marketplaces would be established by most of the States with a Federal
backup for those States that did not establish their own marketplaces. The reality is that 36 States chose not to
establish their own exchanges requiring their citizens to purchase needed
health insurance through the Federal exchange.
The ACA provides for substantial premium assistance tax credits to help
make health insurance premiums affordable to lower income and middle class
individuals and families. These credits
apply to taxpayers “enrolled through an Exchange established by the State”
according to the statutory language. The
IRS interpreted this language to include Federal exchanges. This interpretation was challenged in court
and could affect an estimated 5 million people who are receiving the premium
tax credit on the Federal exchange.
Two Federal Appeals Courts ruled on this challenge on
July 22, 2014. A three-judge panel of
the District of Columbia Circuit Court ruled the IRS interpretation
invalid with the consequence that the credits should not be available to those who enrolled through the Federal exchange. The Fourth Circuit held
that the IRS interpretation was consistent with congressional intent. The conflicting opinions will need to be
resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court. The
credit will remain in place for the Federal exchange until final resolution. On August 1st, the U.S. Justice
Department asked the full District of Columbia Circuit Court to reconsider its
opinion, which if it does, could delay the time that this matter will be heard
by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Update: the District of Columbia Circuit Court agreed on September 3, 2014, to rehear the case before the full court and vacated the earlier decision that would deny credits for those enrolling through a Federal exchange.
Second Update: the U.S. Supreme Court agreed on November 7, 2014, to hear this matter. If it rules that credits are not permitted for Federal exchanges, the decision could be the death knell for the ACA as health insurance would no longer be affordable by millions of people relying on the credits.
Update: the District of Columbia Circuit Court agreed on September 3, 2014, to rehear the case before the full court and vacated the earlier decision that would deny credits for those enrolling through a Federal exchange.
Second Update: the U.S. Supreme Court agreed on November 7, 2014, to hear this matter. If it rules that credits are not permitted for Federal exchanges, the decision could be the death knell for the ACA as health insurance would no longer be affordable by millions of people relying on the credits.
Draft Information
Reporting Forms Released
On July 24, 2014, the IRS released drafts of the
following information forms to report health insurance coverage:
·
Form 1095-B:
used by health insurance providers (including self-insured employers) to
report monthly coverage of individuals.
·
Form 1095-C:
used by employers subject to the mandate to report the offering of
health insurance to employees and to list the covered individuals.
·
Form 1094-B:
the transmittal form for submitting Forms 1095-B to the IRS.
·
Form 1094-C:
the transmittal form for submitting Forms 1095-C to the IRS; but this
form also requires additional information pertaining to the aggregation of
related employers and for indicating whether transition relief for 2015 applies
(mid-sized employers having 50 to 99 full-time employee equivalents).
In addition, the IRS released a draft of Form 8965 that
is to be used by individuals to report a marketplace-granted coverage exemption
(e.g. premiums exceed 8% of household income) or a coverage exemption (e.g. a
religious objection) from the individual mandate. This form informs the IRS why the individual
claims exemption from the penalty for not having minimum essential coverage
health insurance.
2014 National
Bronze-Level Premium Set for Individual Mandate Penalty
Unless an exemption applies, individuals and members of
the individual’s tax household must be covered by minimum essential health
insurance each month during 2014 or else pay a tax penalty for each month of
non-coverage. An exception is granted once
each year for short periods of non-coverage that does not exceed three
months. The penalty is the greater of a flat dollar amount or a percentage of
household income, not to exceed the national bronze-level premium amount. Revenue Procedure 2014-46 sets the
bronze-level national premium amount for 2014.
The annual penalty amount is calculated as follows. Note, the amounts shown below are annual
amounts; they should be converted to monthly amounts for purposes of computing
the monthly penalty.
·
Flat dollar amount per adult age 18 and older: $95.00. Flat dollar amount per child under age 18: $47.50.
o The
total flat dollar amount can’t exceed three times the per-adult penalty, so for
2014 the upper limit on the flat dollar amount is $285.
·
The percentage of household income (assessed on
the amount in excess of the income tax return filing threshold amount) is 1%.
·
The national bronze coverage premium for each
individual to be covered is $2,448 with the premium capped at $12,240 for a
family with five or more members.
No comments:
Post a Comment